4 Comments
User's avatar
Priti Pradeep Ghosh's avatar

I find it interesting that AI systems can generate complex outputs but still can’t truly verify their own correctness. It makes me think that human oversight will become even more important as AI gets more advanced. The idea of “plausibility auditors” feels like a realistic role for the future.

Vatsal Naik's avatar

The smarter the AI output, the harder it is to catch the subtle errors buried inside it. We don't need less human oversight as AI improves — we need better humans doing it.

Rajesh Kumar Rama Reddy's avatar

The validator must be outside the system being validated that one line does more work than most AI safety papers I've read. The profession framing landed too. We're building increasingly sophisticated candidates across every domain and quietly assuming the validation infrastructure will figure itself out.

Raghu Ram's avatar

Fascinating reflection. It’s a reminder that intelligence requires an 'Outside' to stay sane. Without the messy, uncurated input of the real world, AI doesn't evolve; it just iterates on its own hallucinations. We are watching the birth of a system that is perfectly coherent, yet completely untethered.